Questa è una versione PDF del contenuto. Per la versione completa e aggiornata, visita:
Verrai reindirizzato automaticamente...
It is 2026 and the choice between google cloud vs aws is no longer a simple matter of who offers the virtual machine at the lowest price. For an Italian Fintech startup, where regulatory compliance (DORA, GDPR) clashes with the need for aggressive time-to-market, this decision defines the company’s technological DNA for the next decade. As a Senior Editor and cloud architect who has overseen critical migrations for financial platforms like MutuiperlaCasa.com, I will analyze the structural differences between the two hyperscalers, going beyond marketing to touch the iron, fiber, and code.
For a Fintech operating in high-frequency trading or instant payments, latency is not a detail: it is a competitive advantage. Both providers have now consolidated their physical presence in Italy (AWS in Milan eu-south-1 and Google Cloud in Milan europe-west8), but the approach to the network is philosophically different.
Google manages one of the largest private fiber-optic networks in the world. When a packet enters Google’s network (via a Point of Presence in Milan or Rome), it travels almost exclusively on their infrastructure to its destination, avoiding the public internet. For Fintech applications requiring cross-border stability, this drastically reduces jitter.
AWS relies more on public transit providers to move data between the user and the data center, although their inter-region backbone is excellent. However, AWS excels in the granularity of Availability Zones (AZ).
The heart of every Fintech is the Ledger. Here the battle between google cloud vs aws becomes fierce and technical.
Spanner is a globally distributed relational database that offers strong consistency (ACID) on a planetary scale. It uses atomic clocks (TrueTime API) in data centers to synchronize transactions.
Aurora is a PostgreSQL/MySQL compatible engine built for the cloud. It separates compute from storage, allowing for rapid scalability.
In 2026, AI is not just an addon; it is the engine for fraud detection and customer care.
Google has a historical advantage in data and models (Gemini). Vertex AI offers a superior end-to-end MLOps suite. If your Data Science team wants to build, train, and deploy custom models for credit scoring, Vertex AI offers more integrated pipelines (based on Kubeflow).
AWS has adopted a pragmatic approach: being the supermarket of models. Bedrock allows API access to models from Anthropic (Claude), AI21, Cohere, and Amazon Titan. For a Fintech wanting to integrate GenAI quickly without managing the underlying infrastructure, Bedrock is often faster to implement and less complex.
Encryption key management is critical for PCI-DSS compliance.
When comparing google cloud vs aws, the fear of lock-in is omnipresent. Here is my decision matrix based on experience:
If you are a Seed or Series A startup, speed is life. Using native services like AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Run, and proprietary databases like DynamoDB or Firestore, allows you to launch products in weeks instead of months. The cost of rewriting code in 3 years is lower than the risk of failing today due to slowness.
If you are building a core banking platform that must last 20 years:
There is no single winner, but there are winners for specific scenarios:
The final choice often falls on the skills already present in your technical team. In a Fintech environment, familiarity with tools reduces human error, which is the true cause of most security disasters.
The choice depends on specific project priorities. Google Cloud proves ideal if advanced data analytics with BigQuery, native Kubernetes, and global transaction consistency are needed. Conversely, AWS becomes preferable if seeking a vast ecosystem, ease in finding talent on the market, and stability in traditional relational databases. Often the final decision should be based on technical skills already present in the team to reduce operational risks.
Google Spanner offers strong ACID consistency on a global scale, making it perfect for core banking systems that cannot afford double-spending errors, although it entails high costs. Amazon Aurora, on the other hand, represents an evolution of PostgreSQL that guarantees rapid scalability and ease of management for services like wallets and KYC, benefiting from a vast availability of developers and compatible tools without the complexity of global multi-master writing.
Google Vertex AI focuses on a complete MLOps suite and proprietary models like Gemini, resulting superior for Data Science teams wanting to build and train custom models. AWS Bedrock instead adopts a supermarket approach, offering API access to various third-party models like Claude and Titan, allowing companies to integrate GenAI quickly without having to manage the complex underlying infrastructure.
Google manages one of the largest private fiber optic networks in the world, making data travel almost exclusively on its own infrastructure to avoid public internet instability. AWS relies more on public transit providers, while offering additional services to improve performance. For high-frequency trading, Google’s method often offers an advantage in terms of deterministic latency between different regions.
For early-stage startups, it is advisable to accept the technological constraint by using native services to accelerate market launch. However, for long-term banking platforms, the best strategy involves using containers on Kubernetes, such as GKE or EKS, and open protocols like PostgreSQL. Using agnostic Infrastructure as Code tools like Terraform helps maintain portability and reduce dependence on a single provider in the long run.