Questa è una versione PDF del contenuto. Per la versione completa e aggiornata, visita:
https://blog.tuttosemplice.com/en/heat-pump-vs-boiler-which-is-worth-it-in-2025/
Verrai reindirizzato automaticamente...
Choosing a heating system has become one of the most complex and strategic decisions for Italian families. Until a few years ago, the answer was almost automatic: the gas boiler represented tradition, safety, and the most economical solution in the immediate term. Today, the scenario has radically changed. Rising raw material costs, new European “Green Homes” directives, and growing environmental sensitivity have brought alternative technologies to the forefront.
In this context, the comparison between the heat pump and the condensing boiler is not just a technical matter, but a true economic crossroads. On one side, we have the evolution of traditional technology, reliable and less expensive to install; on the other, electrical innovation promising a sharp cut in consumption in exchange for a more substantial initial investment. Understanding which solution best fits one’s home, especially in the Mediterranean climate, requires a careful analysis of long-term costs and benefits.
True efficiency lies not only in the chosen technology but in its perfect integration with the thermal characteristics of our home and our lifestyle.
To understand which system is more cost-effective, it is fundamental to understand how they generate heat. The condensing boiler represents the maximum evolution of combustion technology. Unlike old boilers, it recovers the latent heat present in exhaust fumes, which would otherwise be lost to the atmosphere. This process allows for yields exceeding 100% relative to the lower heating value of the gas, guaranteeing immediate savings on methane consumption compared to traditional models. To delve deeper into this technical aspect, it is useful to consult a complete guide to condensing boilers.
The heat pump, on the other hand, operates on a completely different principle. It does not burn fuel but transfers thermal energy from a natural source (air, water, or ground) into the home. Using electricity only to activate the compressor and other components, it manages to produce much more heat than the electrical energy consumed. The key parameter is the COP (Coefficient of Performance): a value of 4 means that for 1 kWh of electricity consumed, 4 kWh of thermal heat are produced.
The first obstacle homeowners must face is the cost of purchase and installation. Here, the difference between the two systems is marked. A good quality condensing boiler, including installation, can cost between 1,500 and 3,000 euros. It is a “plug-and-play” solution: the old generator is replaced without necessarily having to intervene heavily on the existing distribution system, such as cast iron or aluminum radiators.
The heat pump requires a decidedly higher investment. For a complete air-to-water system, costs range between 6,000 and 12,000 euros, depending on power and complexity. Furthermore, installation may require external space for the motor unit and, sometimes, an upgrade to the electric meter. However, to amortize this expense, it is essential to know the tax incentives available in 2025, such as the Ecobonus or Conto Termico, which can drastically reduce the actual outlay.
If the boiler wins on list price, the heat pump usually dominates on operating costs, but with important reservations linked to the price of electricity. In a well-insulated house, the heat pump allows for savings of 30% to 60% on heating costs compared to gas. This advantage becomes overwhelming if you own a photovoltaic system, which allows the system to be powered by self-produced energy at almost zero cost.
The condensing boiler remains competitive if the home has poor thermal insulation or if you live in extremely cold climate zones where the heat pump’s yield might drop. The price of gas is subject to geopolitical volatility, while electricity, despite having increased, offers greater margins of stability if combined with renewables. The pairing with domestic photovoltaics is often the keystone that makes the heat pump economically unbeatable in the long run.
Not all homes are ready to welcome innovation without adaptations. Heat pumps work at their maximum efficiency at low temperatures (between 30°C and 40°C). This makes them perfect for radiant floor systems or modern fan coils. If your home is equipped with old cast iron radiators that need water at 70°C to heat the environment, the heat pump will have to work under strain, reducing savings and efficiency.
In these cases, the condensing boiler proves more flexible, managing high temperatures without problems. However, high-temperature heat pumps designed specifically for renovations exist, although their cost and consumption are slightly higher. Before deciding, it is essential to evaluate the thermal insulation of the building: a “leaky” house will disperse heat too quickly for low-temperature systems.
An aspect often underestimated in the comparison is versatility. Italy, with its Mediterranean climate, is experiencing increasingly torrid summers. Here the heat pump plays its ace in the hole: it is a reversible machine. The same system that heats you in winter can cool the house in summer, eliminating the need to buy separate air conditioners.
Investing in a heat pump means buying two systems for the price of one: winter heating and efficient summer air conditioning.
The condensing boiler, by its nature, produces only heat. Those who choose gas will therefore have to account for an additional expense for the installation of split units or air conditioning systems for the summer months. To better understand the dual function of these devices, it is useful to delve into the operation of heat pumps in reversible mode.
Looking to the future, the regulatory direction is clear. The European Union is pushing towards decarbonization and the electrification of domestic consumption. Gas boilers, while still permitted, are destined for a progressive phase-out. Installing a heat pump today means anticipating the times and increasing the commercial value of the property, improving its energy class.
A “gas-free” house is also safer: risks related to gas leaks or carbon monoxide are eliminated, and a fixed bill (that of methane) is removed from monthly costs. However, for those who cannot face a deep renovation, hybrid systems exist. These combine a small heat pump with a condensing boiler: an intelligent system automatically chooses which source to use based on the external temperature and economic convenience of the moment.
There is no absolute winner between the heat pump and the condensing boiler; there is only the best choice for the specific housing situation. The condensing boiler remains the ideal solution for those with a limited initial budget, living in condominiums with autonomous heating and high-temperature radiators, and without the possibility of installing photovoltaics. It is the choice of continuity, practical and still economically valid in many urban contexts.
The heat pump, on the contrary, is the investment for the future. It is the mandatory choice for new constructions and major renovations, especially if combined with good insulation and solar panels. Although the entry cost is higher, living comfort (heating and cooling), bill savings, and the increase in home value amply repay the effort in the medium-long term. Before signing the quote, the advice is always to request a personalized energy analysis from a qualified thermal technician.
The answer depends on the insulation of the house and usage. The condensing boiler has a much lower initial cost and is ideal for poorly insulated homes or those with old radiators. The heat pump costs more initially but offers significant operating savings in the long term, especially if combined with a photovoltaic system, and is the most ecological option.
Yes, it is technically possible using high-temperature heat pumps, but energy efficiency (COP) decreases significantly having to heat water to 60-70 degrees. To maximize bill savings, heat pumps perform best with underfloor heating or fan coils that work at low temperatures.
In Italy, the 65% Ecobonus for energy redevelopment and the Conto Termico 2.0, which provides a direct reimbursement to your bank account, are active. However, European regulations are progressively reducing incentives for autonomous gas boilers in favor of hybrid or totally electric systems.
Modern heat pumps work effectively even at temperatures below zero (down to -15°C or -20°C). However, in extremely harsh or very humid climates, the yield drops due to defrosting cycles. In these areas, a hybrid system (heat pump + support boiler) is often the safest and most efficient solution.
The heat pump requires much more space. It mandatorily requires an external unit (the motor) to be placed on a balcony or in the garden, and often an internal tank for domestic hot water. The condensing boiler, on the other hand, is compact and easily installed even in niches or small apartment kitchens.