Versione PDF di: Starmer Tells Trump: Greenland Tariff Threat is ‘Completely Wrong’

Questa è una versione PDF del contenuto. Per la versione completa e aggiornata, visita:

https://blog.tuttosemplice.com/en/starmer-tells-trump-greenland-tariff-threat-is-completely-wrong/

Verrai reindirizzato automaticamente...

Starmer Tells Trump: Greenland Tariff Threat is ‘Completely Wrong’

Autore: Francesco Zinghinì | Data: 19 Gennaio 2026

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has directly confronted United States President Donald Trump, labelling his threat to impose punitive tariffs on the United Kingdom and European allies as "completely wrong." The diplomatic standoff follows President Trump’s ultimatum demanding the purchase of Greenland, a move that has sent shockwaves through NATO and prompted emergency talks across European capitals.

In a tense telephone call on Sunday, the Prime Minister told the US President that penalising allies for maintaining security in the High North undermines the collective defence of the West. According to a Downing Street spokesperson, Starmer was firm in his stance, stating that "applying tariffs on allies for pursuing the collective security of NATO allies is wrong." The call was part of a flurry of diplomatic activity as European leaders scramble to present a united front against the looming trade war.

The Ultimatum: Tariffs or Territory

The crisis erupted on Saturday when President Trump announced on his Truth Social platform that the US would impose a 10% tariff on "any and all goods" from eight European nations starting February 1. The President warned that these levies would rise to 25% by June 1 unless a deal is reached for the "complete and total purchase of Greenland" from Denmark. The nations targeted include the UK, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Finland.

According to reports from The Guardian, Trump justified the move by claiming that these nations had "journeyed to Greenland, for purposes unknown," referring to the recent "Arctic Endurance" military exercises. The US President has long viewed the semi-autonomous Danish territory as a strategic asset essential for American national security, a position he first floated during his previous term in office.

United Kingdom’s Response

Sir Keir Starmer’s government has moved quickly to reject the link between trade tariffs and sovereign territory. Following his call with President Trump, the Prime Minister spoke with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte to coordinate a response. "In all his calls, the Prime Minister reiterated his position on Greenland," Downing Street confirmed. "He said that security in the High North is a priority for all NATO allies in order to protect Euro-Atlantic interests."

Domestically, the government has found support from across the political spectrum in parliament. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch agreed with the Prime Minister, stating that "the sovereignty of Greenland should only be decided by the people of Greenland" and warning that tariffs would be a burden on British businesses. Even Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK and a long-time ally of Trump, admitted that "these tariffs will hurt us," noting that while he often agrees with the US government, "in this case we certainly don’t."

International Backlash and NATO Unity

The international reaction has been swift and severe. In a joint statement, the eight affected nations declared that "tariff threats undermine transatlantic relations and risk a dangerous downward spiral." They defended the presence of their troops in Greenland, clarifying that the military personnel were there for pre-planned NATO exercises designed to strengthen Arctic security, not to threaten US interests.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen was particularly blunt, asserting that "Europe will not be blackmailed." French President Emmanuel Macron also weighed in, calling the threats "unacceptable" and emphasising that France is committed to the sovereignty of nations. According to Al Jazeera, the European Union has scheduled an emergency meeting to discuss potential retaliatory measures if the US administration proceeds with the levies next month.

Strategic Implications for the Government

For the UK government, this dispute represents a significant foreign policy challenge. Since taking office, Starmer has attempted to build a pragmatic working relationship with the Trump White House. However, this latest development threatens to derail those efforts. The imposition of tariffs could have severe economic consequences for the UK, potentially affecting laws and trade agreements currently under negotiation.

Analysts suggest that the US President is using the threat of economic pain to force a concession on Greenland, a strategy that risks fracturing the NATO alliance at a time when unity is crucial. The "Arctic Endurance" exercise, which Trump cited as a provocation, was intended to demonstrate NATO’s capability to operate in extreme environments, a necessity given rising tensions with Russia in the region.

Conclusion

As the February 1 deadline approaches, the standoff over Greenland has evolved from a diplomatic curiosity into a full-blown transatlantic crisis. Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s direct rejection of President Trump’s tariff threat signals that the UK is unwilling to compromise on principles of sovereignty and alliance solidarity, even in the face of economic pressure. With the US Congress and European parliaments watching closely, the coming weeks will be decisive in determining whether this dispute leads to a trade war or a diplomatic resolution.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has President Trump threatened tariffs on the UK and European allies?

The US President issued an ultimatum demanding the purchase of Greenland from Denmark. He announced that a 10 percent tariff would be imposed on goods from eight European nations starting February 1, potentially rising to 25 percent, unless a deal is reached. This move is reportedly a reaction to recent NATO military exercises in the region which he viewed with suspicion.

How has Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to the Greenland tariff threats?

Sir Keir Starmer directly confronted the US President during a telephone call, labelling the threat as completely wrong. He argued that penalising allies for maintaining security in the High North undermines the collective defence of the West. The Prime Minister has also coordinated with Danish and EU leaders to present a united front against linking trade penalties to sovereign territory.

What is the Arctic Endurance exercise mentioned in the dispute?

Arctic Endurance refers to pre-planned military exercises involving NATO allies designed to strengthen security capabilities in the High North. While President Trump claimed nations had journeyed to Greenland for unknown purposes, the participating countries clarified that these operations were standard procedures to protect Euro-Atlantic interests and demonstrate capability in extreme environments, rather than a provocation against the United States.

Which European nations are targeted by the proposed US tariffs?

The threatened levies target eight specific nations: the United Kingdom, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Finland. Leaders from these countries have issued joint statements warning that such measures would harm transatlantic relations and risk a dangerous downward spiral in trade. Domestic political figures in the UK have warned that these tariffs would significantly burden British businesses.

How does the dispute over Greenland impact NATO relations?

This diplomatic standoff threatens to fracture the NATO alliance at a critical time when unity is essential for global security. By linking economic punishment to the sovereign territory of a NATO member, the dispute challenges the principles of alliance solidarity. Analysts suggest that using economic pain to force territorial concessions risks derailing pragmatic working relationships and complicates the collective defence strategy against other global threats.