In the educational landscape of 2026, administrative burden remains a leading cause of burnout in the school sector. The use of tools like ChatGPT and Claude is no longer a futuristic novelty, but an essential skill for modern teaching staff. This technical guide is dedicated specifically to the use of chatgpt for teachers, with the goal of transforming hours of bureaucratic writing into seconds of processing, while maintaining a high pedagogical standard and full compliance with privacy regulations.
Introduction: AI as an Administrative Assistant
Generative artificial intelligence should not replace the teacher’s judgment, but enhance it. Although the human relationship remains irreplaceable, the drafting of formal documents such as Personalized Learning Plans (PDP), evaluation grids for Learning Units (UDA), and final reports follows logical and linguistic patterns that Large Language Models (LLM) can replicate with extreme precision. Learning to structure an effective prompt means freeing up valuable time to dedicate to active teaching.
Fundamental Prerequisites and Data Security
Before starting to write prompts, a security protocol must be established. According to the guidelines of the Data Protection Authority and the directives of the Ministry of Education and Merit (MIM), sensitive student data must never be shared with public platforms.
The Golden Rule of Anonymization
When using chatgpt for teachers to draft specific documents about a pupil, you must apply rigorous pseudonymization:
- Never use the real first and last name (e.g., use “Student X” or “Pupil A”).
- Remove specific references to the family or residential address.
- If you cite clinical diagnoses (e.g., ICD-10 codes for SLD or Law 104), ensure they cannot be traced back to the student’s physical identity within the chat context.
Anatomy of an Advanced Prompt: The R-C-T-O Framework
To obtain professional and non-generic results, abandon simple commands like “Write me a grid.” Instead, adopt the R-C-T-O framework (Role, Context, Task, Output). Here is how to structure it:
- Role: Define who the AI is (e.g., “You are an expert teacher in inclusive education and Italian school regulations”).
- Context: Provide the details of the situation (school level, subject, class type).
- Task: The specific action to perform.
- Output: How you want to receive the answer (table, bulleted list, formal discursive text).
Tutorial 1: Generating Evaluation Grids (Rubrics)
Creating analytical evaluation grids requires time to balance indicators and descriptors. Here is how to automate the process for a test or a reality task.
The Prompt to Copy
Prompt:
“Act as a [SUBJECT] teacher for a [YEAR AND SCHOOL TYPE, e.g., 3rd Year Scientific High School] class.
I need to evaluate an assignment consisting of: [TASK DESCRIPTION, e.g., Short essay on the French Revolution focusing on economic causes].
Create an evaluation grid in table format.
The columns must be: Indicators, Descriptors by level (Severely Insufficient, Insufficient, Sufficient, Good, Excellent), Score (from 1 to 10).
Include indicators for: Relevance to the theme, Morphosyntactic correctness, Argumentative capacity, and Use of specific vocabulary.”
Expected result: The AI will generate a table ready to be copied into Word or Excel, with progressive descriptors (e.g., “The student exposes facts confusedly” vs “The student argues with stringent logic and originality”).
Tutorial 2: Drafting the Personalized Learning Plan (PDP)
Drafting the PDP for students with SEN (Special Educational Needs) or SLD (Specific Learning Disabilities) is one of the most burdensome activities. The goal is to translate clinical and didactic observations into concrete dispensatory measures and compensatory tools.
Operational Strategy
Do not ask the AI to invent the PDP. Provide the (anonymized) observations and ask it to match them with the teaching strategies provided by Law 170/2010 and subsequent ministerial notes.
The Advanced Prompt for the PDP
Prompt:
“You are an expert in inclusive education and SEN/SLD regulations in Italy. I need to draft the teaching strategies section of the PDP for ‘Student X’ who attends the second year of middle school.
Student Profile: Has a diagnosis of Dyslexia and Dysorthography. Shows difficulty in reading aloud, slow execution, but excellent oral skills and logical connection abilities. Tires easily during long texts.
Request: Generate a structured list of:
1. Suggested Dispensatory Measures (consistent with the profile).
2. Suggested Compensatory Tools.
3. Methodological and didactic strategies for oral subjects.
4. Personalized evaluation criteria.
Use formal language, suitable for an official school document.”
This approach allows you to obtain targeted suggestions such as “Exemption from reading aloud in class,” “Use of concept maps during tests,” or “Evaluation of content rather than orthographic form,” saving manual research for standard wording.
Tutorial 3: Final Reports and Global Judgments
At the end of the year or term, synthesizing the progress of a class or a single student requires clarity. ChatGPT for teachers excels at synthesizing bullet points into fluid prose.
Workflow for Reports
- Collect raw data (e.g., “Lively class, participative but chaotic,” “Math grade average: 6.5,” “Projects done: Theater and Robotics”).
- Insert them into the prompt asking for an institutional tone.
Prompt:
“Write a final disciplinary report for the 4th Grade Elementary class, History subject.
Key points to include: The program was 90% completed. The class showed great interest in the Egyptians but difficulty memorizing dates. Behavior improved in the second term. We went on a field trip to the Egyptian Museum.
Style: Formal, synthetic, professional. Length approximately 200 words.”
Troubleshooting: What to do if the AI makes mistakes
Even the most advanced models can have “hallucinations” or produce overly generic texts. Here is how to solve common problems:
- Text too robotic: Add to the prompt: “Use a more empathetic and less bureaucratic tone, while maintaining professionalism.”
- Incorrect regulations: If the AI cites non-Italian laws, always specify in the context: “Refer exclusively to Italian school regulations current in 2026.”
- Forgets previous instructions: In LLM models, the “context window” is limited. If the conversation is too long, summarize the rules or start a new chat for each important document.
In Brief (TL;DR)
The strategic use of artificial intelligence drastically reduces the bureaucratic load on teachers, transforming hours of document drafting into a few moments of assisted processing.
Applying the R-C-T-O framework allows for the generation of precise evaluation grids and Personalized Learning Plans, elevating pedagogical quality through well-structured prompts.
Student privacy protection is guaranteed by rigorous anonymization protocols that prevent the sharing of sensitive data with digital platforms.
Conclusions
Integrating chatgpt for teachers into the daily workflow is not a shortcut to avoid work, but a tool for administrative efficiency. By automating the creation of grids, PDPs, and reports, the teacher recovers the scarcest resource at school: time to listen to and guide students. Start today by creating your library of personalized prompts and share it with your department to raise the working standard of the entire institute.
Frequently Asked Questions
To use artificial intelligence in compliance with regulations, it is fundamental to apply rigorous data anonymization. You must never insert real first and last names, addresses, or family details, but use generic pseudonyms like «Student X». Clinical diagnoses must also be treated without references that could lead back to the student’s physical identity, following the guidelines of the Privacy Guarantor and the Ministry.
To obtain professional documents and avoid generic responses, it is advisable to adopt the «R-C-T-O» framework. This method requires specifying the Role the AI must assume, the Context of the class and subject, the specific Task to perform, and the desired Output format, such as tables or bulleted lists. This precision transforms simple commands into advanced instructions.
ChatGPT can accelerate the drafting of the PDP by translating anonymized didactic and clinical observations into concrete operational strategies. By providing the student’s learning profile, it is possible to ask the software to suggest dispensatory measures and compensatory tools consistent with Law 170/2010, as well as defining personalized evaluation criteria suitable for the specific difficulties encountered.
It is possible to generate detailed rubrics by asking the AI to act as a teacher of the specific subject and to structure the response in table format. In the prompt, it is necessary to indicate the type of task, the desired evaluation indicators, and the scale of levels. The result will be a grid with progressive descriptors ready to be copied into your work documents.
Regulatory hallucinations are possible if the request is not contextualized. To solve the problem, it is necessary to specify in the prompt to refer exclusively to current Italian school regulations. If the error persists or the text is too generic, it is better to start a new chat to reset the model’s short-term memory and rephrase the instruction with greater precision.
Sources and Further Reading
Did you find this article helpful? Is there another topic you’d like to see me cover?
Write it in the comments below! I take inspiration directly from your suggestions.