In Brief (TL;DR)
The choice between an hourly and a goal-based work model depends on many factors: discover the pros and cons of each approach to find the right one for you.
We analyze the pros and cons of each approach to help you understand which one best suits your profession and lifestyle, with a special focus on self-employment.
We analyze the pros and cons of each approach to understand which one best suits your career and lifestyle.
The devil is in the details. 👇 Keep reading to discover the critical steps and practical tips to avoid mistakes.
The world of work is constantly evolving, driven by digitalization and new demands for flexibility. The choice between a model based on hours of attendance and one focused on achieving results is no longer a dilemma for a select few. In Italy, as in the rest of Europe, this discussion is more relevant than ever and affects professionals in every sector. Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of each approach is crucial for guiding one’s career, balancing personal and professional life, and ultimately, choosing the path that’s right for you. This guide explores both methods, analyzing how they fit into the Mediterranean cultural context, in a market that oscillates between an attachment to tradition and a push toward innovation.
The pandemic accelerated trends that were already underway, forcing many companies to rethink their organizational models. Smart working, initially a necessity, opened the door to more autonomous work management, often based on objectives. However, this cultural shift clashes with a tradition, especially in Italy, tied to the concept of fixed hours and physical presence as a measure of commitment. The challenge today is to find a balance that values both productivity and worker well-being, moving beyond the idea that the number of hours spent in the office is directly proportional to the quality of the work performed.

The Traditional Model: Hourly Work
Hourly work is the most widespread and historically rooted contractual model, especially in Mediterranean and Italian culture. Its structure is simple: the worker exchanges a defined amount of their time for a fixed wage. This approach guarantees economic predictability and a clear separation between work hours and free time, a highly valued aspect. “Punching the clock” is the symbol of this mindset, which gives the employer direct control over the employee’s presence and, theoretically, their commitment. For the worker, the certainty of a monthly salary and the end of the workday at a set time are among the most obvious benefits.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Hourly Work
The main advantages of hourly work lie in its predictability and stability. Knowing exactly when the workday begins and ends helps in planning one’s personal life and reduces stress related to uncertainty. Furthermore, compensation is guaranteed regardless of productivity peaks, offering financial security. However, the disadvantages are just as significant. This model can encourage “presenteeism” rather than efficiency: what matters is being at the workplace, not necessarily being productive. This can lead to low motivation, a less-than-stimulating routine, and a reduced drive for professional self-fulfillment, hindering the growth of both the individual and the company.
The Innovation of Goal-Based Work
Goal-based work, or results-oriented work, shifts the focus from time spent to the quality and achievement of specific milestones. In this model, performance is not measured in hours, but in completed projects, targets met, or problems solved. This method is intrinsically linked to modern concepts like smart working and agile work, where flexibility in hours and location is maximized. The worker enjoys great autonomy and responsibility: they decide how and when to work to complete their assigned tasks. This approach values efficiency and self-organization skills, rewarding those who can achieve more in less time. It’s a paradigm shift that requires trust from the employer and a strong sense of responsibility from the employee.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Goal-Based Work
The biggest advantage of goal-based work is flexibility. Being able to manage your own time allows for a better work-life balance, with direct benefits for well-being and motivation. Workers feel more empowered and integral to the company’s success, which can increase productivity and personal satisfaction. Among the disadvantages, however, is the risk of never “unplugging,” with work hours encroaching on personal space. The absence of fixed hours can lead to working more than necessary to meet goals, especially if they are unrealistic. Furthermore, for freelancers or those with results-based contracts, income instability can be a source of stress. This model requires excellent time management and self-discipline skills.
The Italian and European Context: Between Tradition and Innovation
The European labor market is a mosaic of cultures and approaches. While Northern European countries have more quickly embraced flexible models, the Mediterranean region, including Italy, shows a slower transition. In Italy, the culture of the “posto fisso” (a permanent job) and the preference for traditional work hours are still deeply rooted. However, the push for innovation is strong, thanks in part to European directives and increasing digitalization. According to recent data, in 2024, there are about 3.55 million smart workers in Italy, a number stable compared to the previous year, with growth primarily in large companies. This indicates a gradual, albeit cautious, opening towards more flexible and results-oriented work models.
Although Italy still lags behind the European average for the prevalence of working from home (12.2% versus 22.4% in 2022), the trend is growing. Italian companies, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, struggle to abandon presence-based control, still viewing smart working more as a tool for work-life balance than as a true strategic lever. Yet, the demand for flexibility from workers is higher than ever: 73% would oppose a full return to the office. This gap between worker expectations and what companies offer represents one of the main challenges for the future of work in Italy, a country that must learn to combine its solid manufacturing and artisanal tradition with the opportunities of digital innovation.
How to Choose the Right Model for You
The choice between hourly or goal-based work is deeply personal and depends on a variety of factors. The first element to consider is the nature of your profession. Some jobs, such as creative, consulting, or software development roles, naturally lend themselves to a results-based evaluation. Others, like customer service, retail sales, or factory production, require a physical presence and a defined schedule. It’s important to analyze whether your tasks can be broken down into clear, measurable, and realistic goals (following the SMART principle).
Another crucial aspect is your personality. Are you an extremely organized, disciplined person capable of self-management? Then goal-based work could enhance your skills. If, on the other hand, you need an external structure, defined routines, and a clear separation between work and free time to feel at ease, the hourly model might be more suitable. Honestly assess your ability to handle stress related to deadlines and a potentially variable income. Finally, consider your lifestyle and priorities. If you desire maximum flexibility to travel, work on a side hustle, or manage family commitments, goal-based work offers unparalleled autonomy. The ideal choice often lies in a hybrid model, which combines the security of a fixed base with the flexibility provided by clear objectives.
Conclusions

The contrast between hourly work and goal-based work has no absolute winner. Both models have advantages and disadvantages that must be weighed based on the professional, cultural, and personal context. The traditional hourly model offers security and a clear demarcation between work and private life, a pillar of Mediterranean work culture. On the other hand, goal-based work responds to the growing demand for flexibility, autonomy, and meritocracy, driving innovation and greater individual responsibility. The future of work, in Italy and Europe, seems to be heading towards hybrid solutions capable of integrating the best of both approaches. Companies will need to develop a culture based on trust and clarity of objectives, while workers will need to enhance their digital skills and self-management abilities. The real challenge will be to find a sustainable balance that values both results and people’s well-being, definitively moving past the “time equals productivity” equation.
Frequently Asked Questions

There’s no single answer; the choice depends on personal preferences, the type of profession, and career goals. Hourly work offers stability and a clear separation between work time and private life, typical of traditional Italian culture. Goal-based work, on the other hand, provides greater flexibility and autonomy, rewarding productivity and efficiency. It’s a growing model, driven by innovation and smart working, that focuses on the end result rather than hours of office presence.
For a freelancer, the choice is strategic. Project-based pricing (goal-based) is often seen as ideal because it allows you to sell the value of a project, not your time, providing maximum organizational freedom. On the other hand, an hourly rate or retainer offers more security for ongoing projects or consulting where time estimates are difficult. The best choice can also depend on your business’s financial structure and how you manage invoicing and taxes.
Yes, but with some clarifications. The prevailing employment contract model in Italy for salaried work is based on the time-for-money exchange. However, goal-based work is becoming more common, especially with agile work (smart working) agreements. The law does not prohibit linking part of the salary to performance bonuses or the achievement of specific objectives, through individual agreements or second-level bargaining. It’s important to note that, according to the Supreme Court (Cassazione), an employee cannot be fired solely for failing to meet objectives, as the primary obligation remains to make their time and energy available.
Generally, intellectual, creative, and digital professions are very well-suited for goal-based work. For example, software developers, copywriters, graphic designers, consultants, and managers can easily measure the results of their work. Sales roles, where sales targets are clear and measurable, are also ideal. Conversely, professions that require a constant physical presence or provide real-time services, such as customer support, retail sales staff, or assembly line workers, are more naturally based on an hourly model.
The transition requires a cultural shift for both the worker and the company. For the worker, it means developing self-discipline, planning skills, and focusing on priority management to optimize time. For the company, it involves moving beyond the control model based on physical presence, defining clear, measurable, and realistic goals (so-called SMART goals), and adopting tools to monitor results instead of hours worked. It is a journey that values responsibility, trust, and autonomy, leading to greater motivation and productivity.

Did you find this article helpful? Is there another topic you'd like to see me cover?
Write it in the comments below! I take inspiration directly from your suggestions.