Generative artificial intelligence is reshaping the business landscape, promising efficiency and innovation. At the heart of this revolution lies Google’s Gemini suite, a powerful set of tools that raises crucial questions about privacy and data security. For Italian and European companies, immersed in a culture that values confidentiality and regulated by the GDPR, understanding Google’s policies for 2025 is not just a matter of compliance, but of trust. This article explores the guarantees offered by Google, analyzing how the balance between tradition and technological avant-garde is managed in the specific context of the European market.
Navigating between the promises of AI and data protection needs requires a clear understanding of the rules of the game. Businesses, from small professional firms to large multinationals, are asking: are our data used to train Google’s models? What controls do we have over the sensitive information we entrust to these systems? We will examine in detail the policies for Gemini in Google Workspace and for APIs intended for developers, highlighting the differences and offering a clear vision on how to protect corporate information assets in the era of artificial intelligence.
Google’s Privacy Policy for Gemini in Workspace
Google adopts a specific approach for the data of companies using Gemini within Google Workspace. The fundamental promise is that customer data is not used to train generative artificial intelligence models outside the corporate domain without explicit authorization. Interactions with Gemini, such as prompts entered in the Gmail or Docs side panel, remain confined within the organization. This means that company information, draft contracts, or market analyses discussed with the AI assistant do not become part of Google’s global “brain” for the benefit of other customers.
Existing security and privacy protections in Google Workspace are automatically applied to Gemini as well. This includes access controls, Data Loss Prevention (DLP) rules, and the ability to use Client-Side Encryption. With client-side encryption, neither Google nor its AI systems can decrypt the content, thus offering the highest level of confidentiality for the most sensitive data. Administrators maintain granular control, being able to enable or disable Gemini features for specific users or groups, ensuring a secure and controlled implementation of AI in the company.
Guarantees for Users of Gemini, Imagen, and Veo APIs
When companies use the Gemini, Imagen, or Veo APIs directly in their applications, the privacy framework takes on different contours. For users of paid plans, Google offers a crucial guarantee: data sent and received via these APIs is not used for general training of its models. This policy is fundamental for businesses developing proprietary solutions based on Google’s AI that need to protect their intellectual property and their customers’ data. The separation between customer data and Google’s training datasets is a pillar of trust for the enterprise market.
However, it is important to distinguish between general use and specific model optimization (tuning). If a company decides to “tune” a Gemini model with its own data to improve performance on specific tasks, such data is obviously used for that targeted training. In this case, the data still remains confined to the customer’s model. Furthermore, Google records and retains interaction logs for security, monitoring, and abuse prevention purposes, in line with common cloud industry practices. European companies must consider that, although there are controls on data residency, log management might follow global policies.
GDPR Compliance and Security Certifications
In the European context, compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a non-negotiable requirement. Google addresses this need by ensuring that Gemini for Google Workspace is a “core” service covered by the same Data Processing Agreements (DPA) as other Workspace services. This implies that Google acts as a data processor on behalf of the customer, with precise contractual obligations. Regarding APIs, GDPR compliance is supported by mechanisms such as the ability for EU users to request data access or deletion, although corporate policies make the process less direct compared to consumer services.
To reinforce security guarantees, Google subjects its infrastructure, including services supporting Gemini, to rigorous third-party audits. The Gemini suite for Google Cloud boasts a wide range of international certifications, including ISO/IEC 27001, 27017, 27018 and SOC 2/3. These attestations verify the adoption of robust controls for information security management, personal data protection in the cloud, and privacy. For Italian companies, these certifications represent tangible proof of Google’s commitment to maintaining high standards, a key factor in entrusting their data to a cloud and AI service provider. For greater peace of mind, it is advisable to delve into cloud storage security practices.
Mediterranean Tradition and Innovation: A Possible Balance
Mediterranean culture, and specifically Italian culture, harbors a deep sensitivity for privacy, viewed not only as a legal right but as a rooted cultural value. The idea of entrusting corporate secrets to an abstract digital entity can generate natural mistrust. Google seems to understand this cultural resistance, proposing a model where innovation does not override confidentiality. The most fitting example is that of a small law firm using Gemini in Workspace to summarize complex rulings: the guarantee that the content of those documents will not be used to train public models is the essential condition for adopting the tool.
This approach allows reconciling tradition and innovation. A historic manufacturing company, pride of Made in Italy, can use AI to optimize the production chain by analyzing internal data, without fearing that its innovative processes are “learned” and made available to competitors. The key lies in granular controls and clear policies separating customer data from global training. In this way, AI becomes a strategic ally that respects the corporate perimeter, a fundamental concept in an economic fabric like Italy’s, made up of small and medium-sized enterprises that base their success on unique and jealously guarded know-how. Email communication security remains a crucial starting point in this process.
Practical Cases and Risk Management
Let’s imagine an Italian fintech startup developing a financial advice app using Gemini APIs. Its main asset is user trust. The startup chooses Google’s paid plan precisely for the guarantee that its customers’ sensitive financial data will not contribute to improving Google’s general models. To further mitigate risks, it implements data anonymization techniques before sending them to the API and uses Google Cloud’s Access Transparency controls to monitor every data access by the provider.
Another example is a company in the healthcare sector adopting Gemini in Workspace to improve internal collaboration. To comply with strict health data privacy regulations (such as HIPAA, which Google complies with), the company configures client-side encryption for all documents containing patient information. In this way, even if an employee used Gemini to analyze a medical record, the content would remain unreadable to Google. This demonstrates how proper configuration of available tools is fundamental to creating an innovative yet secure work environment, proactively addressing the challenges of protection against online scams and data leaks.
In Brief (TL;DR)
With the growing adoption of AI-based tools, we analyze the privacy policies and guarantees Google offers in 2025 to companies relying on the Gemini suite for managing sensitive data.
With the increasing adoption of Gemini, Imagen, and Veo, we analyze the security measures and updated policies for 2025 that protect your company’s sensitive information.
Discover the guarantees offered by Google to ensure that API data is not used to train models, protecting your intellectual property.
Conclusions
For Italian and European companies looking towards 2025, the adoption of Google’s Gemini suite presents itself as a strategic opportunity, provided it is navigated with awareness. Google’s policies clearly distinguish between the use of Gemini in Workspace and the use of paid APIs, offering solid guarantees regarding the non-use of corporate data for training global models. This separation is the core of Google’s strategy to win the trust of the enterprise market, which is particularly sensitive to privacy in the context of the GDPR.
The availability of advanced controls such as client-side encryption, granular access management, and a portfolio of internationally recognized security certifications provides organizations with the tools to build a robust security perimeter. The balance between the drive for innovation, represented by the powerful capabilities of AI, and respect for the cultural tradition of privacy is possible. The key to success lies in careful data governance and a deep understanding of policies, transforming Gemini from a potential risk into a powerful ally for growth and competitiveness in the future market.
Frequently Asked Questions
No, for paid enterprise versions of the Gemini suite (APIs and Google Workspace), Google contractually commits not to use customer data (prompts, uploaded files, responses) to train or improve its artificial intelligence models for the general public. Data is used only to provide the specific service requested and is processed according to the Data Processing Addendum. The situation is different for free/consumer versions, where data may be used to improve services.
Yes, Google has structured Gemini services for businesses to be GDPR compliant. For customers in the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and the UK, the use of paid services is mandatory, which guarantees greater protections. Data is processed according to the Cloud Data Processing Addendum, which aligns with GDPR requirements. Additionally, Google offers security certifications such as ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2/3.
Yes, the fundamental privacy guarantees apply to the entire suite of generative AI APIs for businesses, which includes Gemini, Imagen (image generation), and Veo (video generation). When used in a paid corporate context, data provided to these APIs is not used for training Google’s general models. All these services are covered by the same terms of service and data processing addenda for business customers.
Partially. Gemini prompt processing occurs in an optimized manner at Google facilities closest to the user to reduce latency, but this does not guarantee that processing happens exclusively in Europe. However, once content generated by Gemini is saved in a service like Google Docs or Gmail, customers with eligible Workspace versions can use the ‘Data Regions’ feature to choose to store that data ‘at-rest’ specifically in Europe.
The difference is crucial for corporate data privacy and security. With the free version, your inputs and conversations can be read by human reviewers and used to train and improve Google’s AI models. With the paid enterprise version (via API or Google Workspace), your data is confidential, is not used for general training, and is protected by specific legal agreements (Cloud Data Processing Addendum) and enterprise-level security controls.
Did you find this article helpful? Is there another topic you'd like to see me cover?
Write it in the comments below! I take inspiration directly from your suggestions.